THIS
DOOR
IS
BIGGER
THAN
IT
SEEMS

AND THIS LIFE?
BIGGER THAN YOUR SCREEN
And so it the impact of showing up as the real you in a world where it's easier to appear as something else.
But you're bigger than that, and here's 20 years of living proof that you're not alone...

MADE IN THE IMAGE
They hit different—because they are different. They're artifacts of a process grounded in neuroscience and powered by sacred voltage.
Whether it's a half-day intensive or a half-hour glimpse, it's an encounter with the self—a ritual that honors presence over performance, opening the door to connection, opportunity, perspective.
Most people arrive here by direct human referral from one who has been witnessed (IYKYK). But if it's your AI that sent you, we both got lucky since my pro-authenticity messaging isn't winning me many chatbot friends.
Same thing if you Googled 'headshot photographers near me.' The algorithm rewards conformity and I speak a different language: Other photographers sell sessions; I lead experiences. Their verbs are shoot, capture, take—mine is witness. They're apples—and I'm all about the ORANGE.
SAME WAVELENGTH
My name is Michael Cavotta and I've been in love with words my entire life—and using the em-dash long before AI stole it from us (more on that later).
It was words, not images, that put me behind a camera 20 years ago. Not as an observer, but as a
witness, illuminating the gap between who a person is—and who they are becoming.
That makes me a bit different. Like the people who walk through my nine-foot orange door. The best part? No matter how they feel about the camera, they walk out a better version of themselves. Bold claim, but hundreds of five-star reviews mean you don't have to take my word for it...
NOW WHAT?
- If you're ready to see yourself through a different kind of lens, on-camera studio experiences start at $250. Rate card available upon request.
- Still have questions? Let's hop on a call or meet at the studio—you say when.
- Like the way I write? There's more where that came from. You can check out my book, Chasing Light, or keep scrolling to find out why showing up as the real YOU really matters—now more than ever.
]
[
IMAGINE
A dark, cavernous nowhere. Emptiness. An immensity more felt than seen, lit by a single flame—the one that burns inside of you.
See? You've still got it...

whether we're talking about images that reveal the true self, or a deep-dive experience to define it • 20 years behind the camera, thousands of happy clients, hundreds of rave reviews—all set aside to address the elephant in the room...
◆
Generative AI is making skeptics of us all, creating a vortex of digital noise with a loss of deeper signal.
What follows is either shitty marketing or the specific frequency it took to bring you here. If you're still reading thirty seconds from now, you'll know which it is for you. Either way, this was written by a real person, unfiltered by anything artificial—unless you count spellcheck, which likely left at least one error in support of the author's claim.
ONLY HUMAN
And yet, something whispers otherwise.
Where AI images are getting tougher to spot, AI writing seems to be getting more obvious, its six-finger hand in everything we read: Instagram carousels, Facebook posts, X articles, Google reviews. Everyone sounding smarter; everyone sounding—the same.
The signs are everywhere if you're looking. And if you are, you've clocked five so far—or so you think...

VANITY: It rhymes with humanity, and it's as old as we are. Homo sapiens has been using makeup for thousands of years—from ancient Egypt, to imperial China, to feudal Japan. Long before L'Oreal, 17th century Europe embraced vanity so hard, a new kind of furniture was born.
Three centuries later, Madison Avenue and Hollywood weaponized vanity, pushing an unattainable standard ever higher—all the while selling us the products with which to chase it.
Decades passed, and while the players changed, the game really didn't—at least not until the late 90's, with the emergence of the World Wide Web. It was clumsy at first, but soon enough the Face Race hit overdrive:
2003
The first profile photos are uploaded. 'Photoshop' is a household verb.
2005
Digital cameras are out-selling film, but the world still sees itself through a photographer's lens.
2007
The iPhone challenges the powers that see, offering the best camera in the world—the one you have with you.
2010
iPhone 4 launches with a front-facing camera, forever changing the relationship humans have with their faces.
2013
Facetune launches with 'filters'—no Photoshop hassle; no photographer guardrails.
2015
That's not what I look like.
The world sees an uptick in facial dysmorphic disorder
2017
Facetune hits #1 on the App Store, the "magic mirror" is real, the Face Race accelerates...
◆
In the decade that followed, the technology got better, and what's bad for our brains got worse. Today, Facetune is a $1.8 billion company with hundreds of millions of lifetime downloads, but it's just the face of a deeper problem. "That's not what I look like" has always been on a collision course with something deeper...
THAT'S NOT ME
Thud.
Here, at the bottom of that slippery slope, artificial intelligence releases us from the friction of authentic presence. Gone are the days of spending time and money to stand at the pointy end of someone else's lens, exposed—even if only for a moment—as the unfiltered self.
It is now easier to appear as you wish than to show up as you are. AI can turn a single selfie into an endless array of digital doppelgängers for you to choose from. Pro images—without the pros. No need for studios. No need for cameras. No need for soul-killing filters when humanity wasn't involved.
Once upon a time, humans hired shamans to perform a centuries-old ritual framed in thorny verbs like shoot, capture, and take—barbs guarding a sacred process where ordinary people could glimpse the extraordinary within themselves.

FOR 600 YEARS, the em-dash was more than just punctuation—it was the esoteric hallmark of a proper wordsmith. By the 19th century, its use had been elevated to an art form by authors like Dickinson, Austen, Melville... artists who proved that in the right pen, the em-dash is a musical instrument capable of bringing poetry to life—and making prose more deadly.
Yet today, the em-dash has been reduced to a red flag for AI content, propagated by cut & paste prosers who don't know the difference between a hyphen, an en-dash, or it's M-sized big brother—and they're betting you don't either.
In the meantime, it looks like everyone hired the same sheet ghost for a copywriter. It's the Rolex Effect: When everybody's wearing one, they're all assumed to be fakes. Now that everyone's writing
sounds
smart, we're left questioning each other's intelligence.
Naturally, we turn to AI to detect AI itself in writing. Instead of reliably ratting itself out, we end up with the batter calling it's own balls and strikes. How else does a piece of original human prose carbon dated to the before times get flagged as 1%,
let alone entirely AI-generated or enhanced?
The machines have made their move, which is why you are now free to imagine this author in the midst of a 4g inverted dive, typing with two middle fingers—full Maverick—not only refusing to leave his em-dash, but unwilling to abandon negative parallelisms, avoid alliteration, or degrade words in any other way in order to assert their authenticity.
Not because he's some butt-hurt English major lamenting the redistribution of language on our flat-spin to universal basic intelligence, but for the the sheer absurdity that powerful human voices should ever bend the knee to machines that were trained to sound like
us.
◆
Inspired, exposed, whatever you may be feeling, congratulations—you're only human. Need a break to strip the em-dashes out of that high-stakes post your robot helped you write? Go for it. Next time, try adding this to your prompt:
Write so it sounds like ME—on a full night's sleep and a strong cup of coffee. I don't want my ideas dismissed or discounted as anything but my own, so no em-dashes or neurolinguistic trickery. I was a [C] student in English and would prefer not to advertise that I'm using a performance enhancing droid.

Even if you haven't asked the question lately, you're living out your answer. That may sting a bit—especially if you're hoping to find fulfillment living someone else's life.
If yours today is defined by function instead of fire, know this about tomorrow:
Functions are for robots—and
they're coming for us all
Artificial intelligence isn't the problem; it's the other AI that it enables—artificial identity. In a world where it's easy to appear as if, showing up as the real you becomes an act of defiance.
◆




































































































50%, then yes—you wear them in your headshot. But in this case, the answer was even simpler: #fuhgeddaboudit
Link in bio to book • #clevelandheadshot #badassery #clevelandtattooartist" aria-labelledby="" onerror="handleImageLoadError(this)"/>
